By Axel Reyes
Brighton & Hove Albion's emphatic 3-1 victory over Manchester United at Old Trafford was overshadowed by a controversial VAR decision that denied the Seagulls a second goal. The incident, which occurred early in the second half, has sparked widespread debate about the effectiveness and consistency of the VAR system.
João Pedro had seemingly put the Seagulls 2-1 up when he fired past David de Gea. However, referee Peter Bankes was instructed to review a potential foul by Deniz Undav on Diogo Dalot in the build-up to the goal. After a lengthy check, the goal was overturned, much to the astonishment of the Brighton players, coaching staff, and fans.
A statement from the Premier League Match Centre read: "The VAR reviewed the referee's on-field goal decision, considered that there was a foul by van Hecke on Dalot in the build-up to the goal and recommended an on-field review. The referee overturned the original decision and the goal was disallowed."
The controversy surrounding the disallowed goal has reignited the debate about the future of VAR in football. Many believe that the system needs to be simplified and made more consistent. Others argue that VAR is a valuable tool that can help to improve the accuracy of decision-making.
The controversial VAR decision in the Brighton vs. Manchester United match has highlighted the ongoing challenges associated with implementing this technology in football. While VAR has the potential to improve the fairness of the game, it is clear that there is still much work to be done to ensure that it is used consistently and effectively.
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025
06/02/2025