Amorim explains his controversial decision to play without a striker against Crystal Palace

Manchester United manager Ruben Amorim's decision to field midfielder Kobbie Mainoo as a false nine against Crystal Palace backfired, as the Red Devils suffered a disappointing 2-0 defeat. The Portuguese coach's gamble on a makeshift forward line failed to pay off, highlighting the team's ongoing struggles in front of goal.

Amorim explained his decision after the match, stating, "It doesn't mean that if you play with two strikers you're going to score more goals. It's a team problem, and we've talked about it. We need to improve in all aspects, especially scoring goals."

When asked if he was disappointed that the club had not yet signed a new striker, Amorim responded: "No, no, things aren't like that. We chose to play with Kobbie, nothing against Rasmus or Josh. Sometimes the team scores goals by creating situations."

The experiment with Mainoo as a false nine failed to yield the desired results, as the young midfielder struggled to make an impact in the final third. His substitution during the second half underlined the difficulties United faced in breaking down a resolute Palace defense.

A Tactical Gamble

Amorim's decision to play Mainoo as a false nine was a bold tactical gamble, but one that ultimately did not pay off. The Portuguese coach was clearly hoping that the young midfielder's creativity and movement could unlock the Palace defense. However, the experiment highlighted the limitations of the current squad.

What Next for United?

With the transfer window still open, it is expected that Manchester United will continue to pursue a new striker. The club needs a proven goalscorer to lead the line and provide the team with a focal point.